<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conforming Loan Limits to Remain in Place for 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lubasf.com/blog/conforming-loan-limits-to-remain-in-place-for-2010.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lubasf.com/blog/conforming-loan-limits-to-remain-in-place-for-2010.php</link>
	<description>San Francisco Realtor Reports on San Francisco Real Estate and San Francisco Living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 16:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luba</title>
		<link>http://www.lubasf.com/blog/conforming-loan-limits-to-remain-in-place-for-2010.php/comment-page-1#comment-2064</link>
		<dc:creator>Luba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lubasf.com/blog/?p=1103#comment-2064</guid>
		<description>The problem is that this situation shouldn&#039;t be artificial - San Francisco IS a high cost area and in my opinion, loan limits should be in place that reflect the area&#039;s property value.  Other areas such as Alaska have been designated high cost areas, even though our property value here in California are significantly higher.  This is something that should be revisited by the powers that be, and instated as a permanent loan limit that increases as cost of living increases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that this situation shouldn&#8217;t be artificial &#8211; San Francisco IS a high cost area and in my opinion, loan limits should be in place that reflect the area&#8217;s property value.  Other areas such as Alaska have been designated high cost areas, even though our property value here in California are significantly higher.  This is something that should be revisited by the powers that be, and instated as a permanent loan limit that increases as cost of living increases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.lubasf.com/blog/conforming-loan-limits-to-remain-in-place-for-2010.php/comment-page-1#comment-2063</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lubasf.com/blog/?p=1103#comment-2063</guid>
		<description>Good news for sellers!  But bad news for buyers.  Anyone who buys with this artificial prop in place will see an immediate and significant decline in the value of their home as soon as the prop is scaled back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news for sellers!  But bad news for buyers.  Anyone who buys with this artificial prop in place will see an immediate and significant decline in the value of their home as soon as the prop is scaled back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
